[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)
notifications at github.com
Thu Nov 16 20:11:08 EET 2017
On 16 November 2017 18:20:16 CET, "Dave Täht" <notifications at github.com> wrote:
>Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <notifications at github.com> writes:
>> Pete Heist <notifications at github.com> writes:
>>> On the positive side(?), with irtt, I don't see the 'latency
>>> effect that I see with netperf, where for whatever reason, certain
>>> flows would stay more fixed in some position relative to the mean.
>>> Also, in these runs, the download throughput was somewhat less with
>>> netperf, but not with irtt.
>> Yeah, one of the issues with the netperf UDP_RR test is that it uses
>> more bandwidth the lower the latency, because it really measures
>> "transactions per second" which Flent then converts to RTT. That is
>> probably also the reason for the 'locking' behaviour...
>The rrul spec was for isochronous behavior. Would not mind a rrulv2
>that did that using irtt.
I don't really see any reason to keep the netperf UDP_RR behaviour for anything other than a fallback. So once I'm done with the integration, RRUL would just switch to isochronous behaviour everywhere whenever irtt is available...
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Flent-users